News chronological

Showing 10 items before 1167421

Filters Applied:

  • Channel A

AMERICARENEWING (Benjamin Osborne) - Can Congress Seat a Member-Elect Who Vows to Destroy our Constitution?

The November 2026 election could produce a member-elect of the House of Representatives who belongs to an organization and adheres to an ideology that has expressly advocated destroying significant components of the existing constitutional structure and who has personally acted to seek those ends. The post Can Congress Seat a Member-Elect Who Vows to Destroy our Constitution? appeared first on The Center for Renewing America .

“Representatives . . . shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.”1 ‘‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.’’2 Introduction  The November 2026 election could produce a member-elect of the House of Representatives who belongs to an organization and adheres to an ideology that has expressly advocated destroying significant components of the…Open

How does the CRA argue that the House can enforce the Article VI oath without violating the Supreme Court's ruling in Powell v. McCormack?
The CRA argues that the House is not "inventing" a new ideological qualification, but rather enforcing a requirement already present in the original Constitution (Article VI). Because the oath is a constitutional requirement, enforcing it as a substantive condition of office—rather than a mere perfunctory recitation—is consistent with the Constitution's own text. They argue that the House is simply judging whether the member-elect satisfies the existing constitutional requirement to bear "true faith and allegiance" to the Constitution "without any mental reservation."
Q&A ID 528b7e94-570d-4361-bf3a-b0ac08ee3fea
What procedural roadmap does the Center for Renewing America propose for the House of Representatives to handle a member-elect who refuses to take the oath in good faith?
The CRA proposes a seven-step process: 1. Build a record before the 120th Congress convenes showing the member-elect has personally embraced the destruction of the constitutional order. 2. Identify the House as the proper authority to judge qualifications under Article I. 3. Raise the Article VI objection when the oath is called. 4. Have the challenged member-elect stand aside. 5. Withhold the oath while the House determines the question. 6. Decide if the oath can be undertaken based on the evidence of the member-elect's commitment to destroying the republic. 7. Resolve the challenge by House vote to exclude the member-elect, declare the seat vacant, and notify the governor.
Q&A ID 972b0ae2-a6b3-4e62-8e3c-461991e6ecee
According to the article, what are the legal standards for determining if an individual's commitment to an organization's unlawful goals can be attributed to them personally?
The article cites several Supreme Court cases to establish that membership alone is insufficient for disqualification. Elfbrandt v. Russell and Keyishian v. Board of Regents establish that the inquiry must depend on whether the individual shares the organization's unlawful purpose and acts with specific intent to further it. Furthermore, Scales v. United States demonstrates that the government must prove an individual is an active member who knows of and intends to advance unlawful objectives, distinguishing this from "nominal, passive, inactive or purely technical" membership.
Q&A ID e5dcac5b-483c-4bc2-bd1b-55b413c18eb1
What role did the Supreme Court play in the case of Bond v. Floyd regarding the congressional oath?
In Bond v. Floyd, the Supreme Court rejected the Georgia House's attempt to prevent Julian Bond from taking his seat based on his opposition to the Vietnam War. However, the Court's reasoning preserved the force of the oath by stating that a legislator can be required to swear to support the Constitution as a condition of holding office. Crucially, the Court distinguished Bond’s case from a situation where a legislator "swears to an oath pro forma while declaring or manifesting his disagreement with or indifference to the oath," leaving the question of a "pro forma" oath (an oath taken in form but not in substance) as an unresolved constitutional issue.
Q&A ID a67c3439-f570-4546-b20b-47f5a3f4ca6b
Keywordsconstitutionpoliticshouse-of-representativesdsared-green-axisrepublicandemocratelection-2026judicial-branchsupreme-courtlaw-and-orderculture-warradical-leftcommunistmarxistislamic-invasionanti-westernconstitutional-lawfederal-governmentlegislative-branchgovernancelegalrightsnationalus

AMERICANGREATNESS (Debra Heine) - NYC Cop Slashers ID’d as Dominican Illegal Alien Repeat Offenders Released into U.S. By Biden Admin., Protected by Sanctuary Democrats

The two suspects wanted for the brutal stabbing of an off-duty NYPD detective in New York City last week are both Dominican illegal aliens with […] Source

Keywordsnycdominicanillegal-alienbiden-administrationdemocratssanctuary-citiesmigrant-crimestabbingnypdnew-york-citycrimeborder-securityimmigrationlaw-and-orderradical-leftpublic-safetyviolencejustice-departmentlegaldetentionus-governmentpoliticsmigrant-crisis

DAILYCALLER (Nicole Silverio) - Senate GOP Fund Tossing Darline Graham A $5,000,000 Lifeline In South Carolina Race

Graham is barely ahead of her Democratic opponent

Keywordssouth-carolinadarline-grahamlindsey-grahamgopsenate-racemagapoliticsrepublicandonald-trumpcongresselectionsctrumpconservatismelection-2026runoffcampaignendorsementpolitical-campaignsc-politicssenateconservative-politicsralph-normanrunoff-electionpolitical-newssenate-electiongop-primarysenatorus-governmentus-senatenational-securityprimaryprimary-electionreplacement-electionrussell-frysouth-carolina-senatesuper-pac314-action-fundalaskaannie-andrewsaugust-runoffaxioscampaign-financedarline-graham-nordonedemocrat

REDSTATE (Rusty Weiss) - Michigan Democrats Spell Trouble for El-Sayed — and It Might Be Too Late to Fix It

Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, drew skepticism from voters in his own party during a pair of MS NOW focus groups this week.

Keywordsmichigandemocratsenate-racepoliticselectionsenatesocialistculture-warelection-2026democratsdetroitgoprepublicansocialismradical-leftliberalismcampaigningdnceconomic-issuesprimary-electionanti-corporatemichigan-politicsbattleground-statesmidwest

THENATIONALPULSE (Christopher Tomlinson) - The Bolsonaros Are Bouncing Back in Brazil as Latin America Swings Right. Here’s Why:

Brazil’s political establishment succeeded in keeping former President Jair Bolsonaro, a major ally of President Donald J. Trump, off the ballot in 2026. It did not succeed in killing Bolsonarismo, the right-wing populist movement he inspired.

Brazil’s political establishment succeeded in keeping former President Jair Bolsonaro , a major ally of President Donald J. Trump, off the ballot in 2026. It did not succeed in killing Bolsonarismo, the right-wing populist movement he inspired. In Sunday’s first round of Brazil’s presidential election, Bolsonaro’s eldest son, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, finished ahead of incumbent left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, setting up a decisive runoff on October 25. The National Pulse shows you the big picture on international politics. If you value this work, please JOIN THE NATIONAL PULSE or MAKE A DONATION today. According to Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court , Flávio received 56.1 million votes, or 47.03 percent,…Open

What role did the Trump administration play in altering the political landscape of Latin America regarding foreign aid?
In 2025, the Trump administration moved to gut the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) by terminating thousands of foreign aid awards and transferring the remaining assistance to tighter State Department control. This move reduced the network of grants that had previously financed NGOs and civil society groups in Latin America, which conservatives had accused of disproportionately empowering progressive organizations.
Q&A ID a7c12466-a4a5-49f8-9314-42f583256f4c
What broader political shifts occurred across Latin America during the early 2020s and leading into 2026?
While the early 2020s saw leftist victories (such as Lula in Brazil, Boric in Chile, and Petro in Colombia), the region shifted rightward. Notable changes included the election of libertarian Javier Milei in Argentina in 2023, the reelection of center-right President Daniel Noboa in Ecuador in 2025, and conservative victories in Chile, Honduras, Costa Rica, Peru, and Colombia during 2026.
Q&A ID 73787123-384f-43cf-9850-7aca1f762efd
How did the Bolsonaro family expand their political influence in the 2026 elections?
The Bolsonaro family achieved significant electoral success beyond Flávio's presidential run. Former First Lady Michelle Bolsonaro won a Senate seat representing the Federal District, while Carlos Bolsonaro won a Senate seat in Santa Catarina. Jair Renan Bolsonaro was elected to the Chamber of Deputies, and Renato Bolsonaro, Jair’s brother, was also elected to the Chamber of Deputies, resulting in four new members of Congress for the family.
Q&A ID 6e59497e-a29e-4f34-b934-484c46aeae8c
How did the Trump administration respond to the prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro and the actions of Justice Alexandre de Moraes?
The Trump administration accused Brazilian authorities of "persecuting" Bolsonaro and specifically targeted Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, accusing him of abusing authority, censoring speech, and targeting political opponents. In July 2025, the White House announced an additional 40 percent tariff on Brazilian goods (bringing affected products to 50 percent) in response to what it described as the "politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution" of Bolsonaro and his supporters.
Q&A ID 34a2c998-e035-44c1-847d-5c823609250d
Keywordsbrazilpoliticselectiongeopoliticslulasocialistconservativedemocracyforeign-policylatin-americaleftistright-wingworld-newspopulismpresidential-electionamerica-firstbolsonaroeconomyflavio-bolsonarogovernmentjair-bolsonarosouth-americatrumpconservatismsocialismelection-2026international-relationsvotinganti-establishmentbrazilian-politicscorruptiondonald-trumpdemocratslegalwhite-houseanti-westernjusticeopinionpolitical-instabilityred-green-axis