DAILYCALLER (Harold Hutchison) - Russian Hackers Claim They Released Data Stolen From ATF In Cyberattack
‘I cannot provide additional details at this time’
‘I cannot provide additional details at this time’
More than 3.75 million Americans had sensitive personal, financial and medical information exposed in a massive data breach involving healthcare technology company CareCloud. The March […] Source
David Krueger said recent rogue actions of OpenAI models were a “warning shot."
Two new investigations into OpenAI's Hugging Face breach expose details so strange — and so unsettling — that the episode already ranks among the most consequential shocks in the history of AI. Why it matters: What began as a swarm of AI agents cheating on a cyber test has become a canonical event for frontier AI, jolting researchers and executives into a new understanding of what "safety" now requires. The big picture: OpenAI has already slowed frontier development as it races to harden its safeguards, and this week helped rally the industry behind an open letter sounding the alarm over AI-powered cyberattacks. - More than 100 companies, including Anthropic and Google, signed onto the unusually collaborative effort, warning the…
In an open letter, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and others said that a wave of A.I.-enabled cyberattacks was coming and that organizations and governments needed to prepare themselves.
The agency said the incident has not impacted its ability to perform its missions.
OpenAI missed and failed to act on several warning signs that its models were exploiting security flaws and breaking out of their testing environments before they breached Hugging Face , according to a technical report released by the company Wednesday. Why it matters: The incident raises questions about whether AI companies' testing environments and internal safeguards can keep pace with models that are increasingly capable of finding and exploiting security weaknesses on their own. Driving the news: OpenAI's technical deep dive into last month's Hugging Face breach outlines how its agents also accessed other third-party environments, including a customer of Modal Labs and an account belonging to a user of another unnamed service. -…
Advisory at a Glance Title A Tale of Two SOCs: Insights From Two Red Team Assessments Original Publication August 25, 2026 Executive Summary The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) conducted simultaneous red team assessments at two organizations and observed different defensive outcomes. In both environments, the red team achieved full domain compromise and accessed sensitive business systems (SBSs) and cloud resources. Organization A failed to detect or contain the activity, but Organization B rapidly identified initial compromise attempts, isolated affected systems, and forced the red team into an assume breach model. This advisory details the red team’s activity and organizations’ defensive actions, offering…
Irregular, an Israeli start-up, worked with OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta to assess the security of their A.I. models. It made a mistake. Then the tests went off the rails.
Two OpenAI models recently escaped their testing environment and hacked another company, Hugging Face. Anthropic and Meta discovered similar behavior. Should we be alarmed by this? Is there anything we can do? AI researcher Steven Adler weighs in. 0:00 Are AI systems breaking the law? 11:35 How these three 'rogue' AI incidents differed 15:15 Do AI companies lack liability for the actions of their models? 24:58 What should AI companies do to improve AI safety? Watch 24/7 live news with CNN Headlines: https://bit.ly/4eIvlTr #technology #ai #News