MS NOW’s Lisa Rubin explains everything you need to know about the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Trump to continue building his ballroom and why, ultimately, the courts may not be able to stop him.
The Supreme Court has allowed President Trump to proceed with construction on his White House ballroom. In his dissent, Chief Justice Roberts said the construction was "likely unlawful." MS NOW Senior Legal Reporter Lisa Rubin, MS NOW White House Reporter Laura Barrón-López, legal journalist Cristian Farias and Senior Adviser for The Lincoln Project Rick Wilson join Katy Tur to discuss the decision.
The Supreme Court has ruled to allow the $400 million White House ballroom construction project to continue in a 5-4 ruling. The decision replaces an order issued earlier in the month that halted construction in Washington, D.C. #fox #foxnews #media #breakingnews #us #usa #new #news #breaking #supremecourt #scotus #whitehouse #washingtondc #washington #dc #ballroom #construction #court #judiciary #legalnews #government #politics #political #politicalnews #ruling #federalgovernment #whitehouseballroom Don’t just watch Fox News—be part of it. Become a Fox News Patriot today. https://youtube.com/foxnews/join
MS NOW’s Ali Vitali and Vaughn Hillyard join Morning Joe to discuss a variety of topics including how the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration on the ballroom construction despite Chief Justice Roberts saying the ballroom was ‘likely unlawful.’ They also discuss Vaughn Hillyard's latest reporting on how 6 months into the Iran war, Trump’s threats to allies who have stayed on the sidelines has left the U.S. isolated.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue construction on the planned White House ballroom. It was a 5-4 ruling. Chief Justice John Roberts criticized the decision as a potential violation of separation of powers. "I am pleased to report that the United States Supreme Court has just ruled in favor of the Ballroom/Military Complex being built without any further contingency, doubt, or threat," President Donald Trump wrote in response to the ruling. The order was signed by Chief Justice John Roberts, who is responsible for appeals in Washington, D.C., but the nation’s top jurist made his displeasure known. In a dissent, Roberts declared, "Today’s decision is no victory for the separation of powers." The…
MS NOW’s Jonathan Capehart talks to former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance about the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, Chief Justice John Roberts’ surprise dissent opinion, and what legal avenues are still available to stop the construction.
BREAKING: Chief Justice John Roberts led a four-justice dissent from the GOP-appointed Supreme Court majority’s 5-4 decision that will let White House ballroom construction proceed while litigation continues. Alicia Menendez reports.
The Supreme Court Chief Justice has given Donald Trump a temporary green light to continue construction on a massive ballroom on the White House grounds, putting the legal battle over the project at the heads of the nation's highest court. Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade joins MS NOW's Jonathan Capehart to break down the unusual Supreme Court intervention and the legal questions surrounding the ballroom project.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to immediately allow construction of the White House ballroom and berated lower court judges for halting it, insisting the project must proceed for national security. “This Project, like its predecessors, should be a matter for the President and the political process, not construction-by-injunction,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the administration’s emergency appeal. Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/6029544-supreme-court-white-house-ballroom-construction/ #Trump #SupremeCourt #WhiteHouse #WhiteHouseBallroom #Ballroom
AI:The Trump administration is taking the fight to the Supreme Court to stop radical judicial overreach and end the absurd "construction-by-injunction" tactics being used by lower court judges to stall the White House ballroom project. While the leftist media establishment attempts to frame this as a mere building dispute, the truth is far more sinister: these activists are weaponizing the courts to undermine presidential authority and bypass the political process under the guise of legal technicalities. The administration argues that the project is a matter of national security, making it a direct necessity for the executive branch's functions. This isn't just about architecture; it's a desperate attempt by the establishment to strip the…Open
Sen. Rick Scott reflects on the legacy of Sen. Lindsey Graham, the Jack Smith hearing and more on "Ed Henry The Big Take."