As Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney files another motion asking a judge to find her not guilty after a mistrial was declared in her triple murder case, jurors are publicly recounting their experience deliberating Clancy's fate. Retired Massachusetts judge James Barretto joins "NewsNation Live" to explain how the holdout juror who allegedly prevented the jury from finding Clancy not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility may have misunderstood the legal standard of reasonable doubt. Get a fast-paced look at the latest from the border to Main Street to the White House on "NewsNation Live." Weekends starting at 10a/9C Saturdays and 11a/10C Sundays. #NewsNationLive NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all…
Earlier on Thursday, the judge reminded jurors of their duty to follow his instructions and repeated the standard for finding or rejecting reasonable doubt.
Plymouth County Superior Court Judge William Sullivan explains the reasonable doubt instruction to jurors after a new note in the Lindsay Clancy trial. #foxnews #news #us #fox #shorts #new #news #breaking #foxnews #lindsayclancy #trial #court #jury #jurors #judge #law #legal #justice #crime #crimenews #crimestory #criminal #police #massachusetts #plymouth #reasonable #doubt #courts #verdict Don’t just watch Fox News—be part of it. Become a Fox News Patriot today. https://youtube.com/foxnews/join
Plymouth County Superior Court Judge William Sullivan explains the reasonable doubt instruction to jurors after a new note in the Lindsay Clancy trial. #fox #media #breakingnews #us #usa #new #news #breaking #foxnews #trial #court #jury #jurors #judge #law #legal #justice #clancy #lindsayclancy #massachusetts #plymouth #reasonable #doubt #instruction Don’t just watch Fox News—be part of it. Become a Fox News Patriot today. https://youtube.com/foxnews/join
As jurors continue deliberating in the Lindsey Clancy murder trial, legal analyst Philip Dubé says the panel's review of key evidence suggests members are taking their responsibilities seriously, but he argued that lingering questions about competing expert testimony could ultimately work in the defense's favor. "If there really are these dueling experts and the jury doesn't know which way to go because both sides are compelling, it means they have reasonable doubt," Dubé said on NewsNation's "Investigation Nation." Get a fast-paced look at the latest from the border to Main Street to the White House on "NewsNation Live." Weekends starting at 10a/9C Saturdays and 11a/10C Sundays. #NewsNationLive NewsNation is your source for fact-based,…
