News chronological

AMERICANALMANAC (Alan Benson) - Michael Flynn: newly declassified FBI notes prove he never should have been charged Thu Sep 10 19:52:23 2026

Retired General Michael Flynn says fully unredacted FBI interview notes, released this week by the White House, show the bureau's own agents knew he did not lie, and that he would never have accepted his 2018 guilty plea had he seen the evidence at the time. The Trump administration's Government Transparency Task Force on Wednesday […] The post Michael Flynn: newly declassified FBI notes prove he never should have been charged appeared first on American Almanac .

Retired General Michael Flynn says fully unredacted FBI interview notes, released this week by the White House, show the bureau's own agents knew he did not lie, and that he would never have accepted his 2018 guilty plea had he seen the evidence at the time. The Trump administration's Government Transparency Task Force on Wednesday declassified the complete, unredacted handwritten and typed notes from Flynn's January 24, 2017 FBI interview, documents that had been partially blacked out for years, even from Flynn's own defense team. Flynn, appearing on the Just the News, No Noise television show that evening, said the newly visible material changes the entire picture of his prosecution under Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The core of Flynn's argument is simple: the agents' own contemporaneous notes show he gave hedged, qualified answers about his December 2016 phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, answers the FBI then repackaged into flat denials in the official typed summary filed weeks later. That repackaging, Flynn contends, manufactured the false-statement charge that upended his life. Handwritten notes versus the official FBI summary Two FBI agents, Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, sat across from Flynn in that January 2017 interview. Both took handwritten notes. The FBI later produced a typed summary called an FD-302, the bureau's standard interview report. The FD-302 was not entered into the FBI's system until more than 20 days after the sit-down. The discrepancies between the handwritten notes and the FD-302 are not minor quibbles over phrasing. They go to the heart of the charge. The FD-302 states that Flynn "falsely stated and represented" to the agents that he "did not ask" Kislyak "to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions the United States had imposed against Russia." But Pientka's own handwritten notes record Flynn responding to that line of questioning with: "Not really. I don't remember. Hey don't do anything." Pientka separately noted that Flynn said there was no "long drawn out" discussion "about don't do anything." In other words, the handwritten notes show Flynn acknowledged, in qualified language, that something along those lines may have come up. The typed summary converted that hedged answer into a flat denial. A second discrepancy involves how many calls Flynn made on December 20, 2016, the day the Obama administration expelled 35 Russian diplomats and authorized the government to respond to Russian cyber operations. The FD-302 states Flynn "remembered making four to five calls that day" but noted the Dominican Republic, where he was on Christmas vacation, "was a difficult place to make a call as he kept having connectivity issues." Pientka's handwritten notes tell a different story. They record: "I [do not] remember making 4-5 calls," using a common shorthand symbol for "do not" or "no," followed by "If did lousy place to call." Strzok's notes similarly record Flynn saying: "If so, don't remember. If so, busy place to make phone calls." The distinction matters. The FD-302 has Flynn affirmatively recalling four to five calls. Both agents' handwritten notes have him saying he did not remember making that many, or, at best, expressing uncertainty. Strzok's text messages and the 20-day gap The delay between the interview and the filing of the FD-302 has long raised questions. Text messages between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, publicly exposed in 2020, shed light on why. Strzok told Page he was "trying not to completely re-write" the summary because of its poor original state. Page, who did not attend the Flynn interview, also provided edits, the messages show. An FBI lawyer who was not in the room editing the official record of a witness interview, weeks after the fact, is not standard procedure. It is the kind of irregularity that, in any other context, would prompt serious questions about the reliability of the document. In Flynn's case, that document became the evidentiary foundation for a federal felony charge. Flynn says the threat to his son forced the plea Flynn was charged in federal court in Washington, D.C., in November 2017 with one count of making false statements to FBI agents investigating allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election. He pleaded guilty in December 2018. On Wednesday, Flynn told Just the News the plea was coerced: "The background of the plea was because of you know the seriousness of what they were going to do going after my son for no reason at all." Flynn said the newly declassified material confirms what his later defense team argued, that the government's representations to the court bore little resemblance to what actually happened in the interview room. He described the FBI's official account as something that "didn't reflect hardly anything of what was actually the truth." His former defense attorney, Sidney Powell, had argued during the case that the FD-302 had been altered by Strzok and Page. Powell filed to withdraw Flynn's guilty plea. Flynn's defense team began seeing redacted versions of the handwritten notes and the typed interview report roughly a year after his conviction, but only in partially blacked-out form. Some of that redacted evidence was placed into the court record. Wednesday's release stripped away the remaining redactions. Flynn said the full picture vindicates his position: "Had I seen that evidence that you have broken, no way in the world. In fact, they would have had no ground to stand on to charge me with anything, and they knew it. They knew it from the beginning." Pardon, lawsuit, and a $1.2 million settlement President Trump pardoned Flynn in November 2020, ending the prosecution. The Department of Justice formally withdrew Flynn's conviction. But Flynn did not let the matter rest. In 2023, he filed a civil suit alleging malicious prosecution and claiming he was targeted because of his association with Trump's 2016 campaign. The suit described the DOJ as having "virulently anti-Trump leadership" at the time of his prosecution. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit in 2024. Flynn refiled after Trump returned to office. The DOJ, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, settled the case for approximately $1.2 million in March 2025, a figure first reported by the Associated Press. Flynn made clear Wednesday he does not consider the settlement or the pardon the final word. "It's not water under the bridge. It has to be exposed. We have to bring these people to account." Grand jury probe into the FBI's Russia investigation gains momentum Flynn's comments arrive as federal prosecutors are ramping up a grand jury investigation into whether the FBI's Russia collusion probe, codenamed Crossfire Hurricane, amounted to a criminal conspiracy to falsely impugn Trump and his supporters during the 2016 election and its aftermath. The specific charges or targets of that investigation have not been publicly identified. Strzok, for his part, has denied wrongdoing in past testimony and in a book he authored, defending the FBI's handling of the Crossfire Hurricane probe. Pientka has not made public statements about the notes or the Flynn interview, based on available reporting. Flynn said the declassified documents contain information he had never seen before. "There is a lot of new information that I was not aware of," he said. What specific sections were previously hidden behind redactions, and why the FBI kept them blacked out for years, even from the defendant, remain open questions. The timeline alone tells a damning story: an interview with hedged, uncertain answers; a typed summary filed three weeks later that flattened those answers into false statements; edits by an FBI lawyer who was never in the room; a felony charge built on that summary; a guilty plea extracted under threat to a family member; and years of redactions that kept the defendant from seeing the agents' own notes. The government eventually paid Flynn $1.2 million and walked away from the conviction. When the people who are supposed to enforce the law have to settle with the man they prosecuted, accountability is not a talking point, it is an unpaid debt. The post Michael Flynn: newly declassified FBI notes prove he never should have been charged appeared first on American Almanac .