News chronological

Latest News

AMERICANTHINKER (American Thinker) - Rolling The Stone

Photo Credit:Titian, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Public Domain By Lars Møller Why conservatism must roll the warning against totalitarianism up every new hill.

Sourcehttps://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/10/rolling-the-stone/
Keywordsconservatismtotalitarianismpoliticsideologywarningculture-waramericausa
Notify Channelt.me/News_Wire
Permalinkhttps://news.site.please-be-patient.com/news/1164835/rolling-the-stone

Related article: STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Born into Privilege, Preaching Revolution •

Related article: STONEZONE (Roger Stone): THE CONGRESSIONAL GRAVY TRAIN MEETS A BARRICADE OF PUBLIC FURY •

Related article: STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Trust the Machine or Trust Your Eyes? •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER (American Thinker Blog): Hungary's warning to conservatives ... and the reforms that survive losing •

Related article: STONEZONE (Roger Stone): No Kings and the Theater of Manufactured Outrage •

Related article: THEFEDERALIST (Jordan Boyd): NYT Writer Pearl-Clutching About Self-Defense Laws Reveals His Contempt For The Constitution •

Related article: STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Why MAGA Must Oppose Corporate Unfairness •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: The Soft Bigotry of Historical Amnesia •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: How Equality Destroys a State •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: From Crassus and Caesar to BLM and ‘Gays for Palestine’: How History Shows The Left’s Alliance Will Fail •

Related article: JUSTTHENEWS (The Center Square Staff): McCuskey praises federal rollback of Endangerment Finding •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: The Ongoing Betrayal of Red States on Overturning Obergefell •

Related article: DAILYCALLER (Mary Rooke): GOP Snake Rears Its Ugly Head Offering 2028 Preview Of Battle Against MAGA •

Related article: THEFEDERALIST (Cass Rutledge): In Massive Military Bill, Congress Considers Putting Anti-DEI Protections Into Law •

Related article: REDSTATE (RedState): Radical Dems Defeat SCOTUS Court-Packing Amendment 212-206 — Only One Broke From the Pack •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: The Third Wave •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: Right-Liberalism is a Non-Starter •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: Time For A Fake Wall To Come Down •

Related article: AMERICANTHINKER: States Pass Legislation to Peer into Your House •

Related article: STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Flock Cameras Harm Law Enforcement’s Aims and Kill Our Constitutional Rights •

From related STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Flock Cameras Harm Law Enforcement’s Aims and Kill Our Constitutional Rights
What are some "nightmare scenarios" involving Flock cameras mentioned in the article?
Potential scenarios include using vehicle tracking to enforce quarantine zones or monitor "non-essential" travel during emergencies; tracking citizens traveling to gun stores, ranges, or Second Amendment events to justify "red flag" actions; monitoring attendance at political rallies, church services, or school board meetings to pressure dissenters; and integrating the network with digital identification or central-bank digital currencies to make movement a "conditional privilege."
Q&A ID 44000d96-f04a-4ff2-9a01-25b6f63bb01e
From related STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Flock Cameras Harm Law Enforcement’s Aims and Kill Our Constitutional Rights
What potential risks do Flock cameras pose to Fourth Amendment protections according to the text?
The text argues that the widespread presence of these cameras leads to the functional end of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches because there is no longer a meaningful presumption of privacy on American roads, creating an expectation that every movement is logged. This continuous tracking can cause people to self-censor, alter their routes, or avoid certain destinations due to the knowledge that their patterns are being recorded and queried.
Q&A ID cee2ed11-e91e-4248-b4fb-1c2bf00d86ad
From related STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Flock Cameras Harm Law Enforcement’s Aims and Kill Our Constitutional Rights
What is the argument against using Flock cameras as a substitute for traditional law enforcement?
The argument is that these cameras act as a "quiet technological substitute" for community policing, which serves as a "sneaky end-run" around the demand to fund and support human police officers. Rather than putting more officers on the streets or detectives on cases, the system shifts authority from local beat cops to a networked database controlled by private vendors and distant administrators, which the author describes as "defunding [law enforcement] by other means."
Q&A ID c93c5677-9402-48d4-a462-6f7258eb8a21
From related STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Flock Cameras Harm Law Enforcement’s Aims and Kill Our Constitutional Rights
How has Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley responded to transparency activists and concerns regarding immigration enforcement?
Garrett Langley has referred to transparency activists who map camera locations as a "terroristic organization," though he later issued a "tepid apology" following backlash. Regarding immigration enforcement, he stated the company has "no opinion" and noted that authorities will enforce the law regardless of Flock's actions.
Q&A ID c4c9527e-a6c3-4943-a8ba-fb0abb873802
From related STONEZONE (Roger Stone): Flock Cameras Harm Law Enforcement’s Aims and Kill Our Constitutional Rights
What specific incidents of vandalism have been reported against Flock cameras in various locations?
Reported incidents include a man being charged for damaging units and leaving homemade flags in Rio Rancho, New Mexico; cameras being cut down and spray-painted in Houston; 25 intentional damage incidents reported by Dallas police since March; a man shooting three cameras with a rifle in Grand Junction, Colorado; and various attacks in Oakland, Oregon, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia involving sawing through poles, destroying solar panels, paint-bombing, or ripping cameras out.
Q&A ID c0b9b5a7-2ece-4129-b048-c2e8c74c2da5
Latest News