Republican Iowa gubernatorial nominee Zach Lahn pulled off a shocking upset by campaigning heavily on an issue few candidates talk about, and he hopes to catch that lightning in a bottle a second time in November. Propelled by endorsements from Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Action and the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point Action, Lahn stunned Trump-backed Republican Iowa Rep. Randy Feenstra in the June 2 primary and will now face Democratic nominee Rob Sand in a race the nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates as a “toss up.” The farmer says his razor-thin win over Feenstra shows that the MAHA movement which Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. built is not going anywhere. “You have to understand…Open
Glyphosate is in the news again. The US Supreme Court has sided with Trump in protecting Monsanto (and Bayer) from legal immunity over Roundup-caused cancer. But what does it all mean? Let's find out with Dr. Michael Antonious, a world-renowned expert in glyphosate toxicology. SHOW NOTES AND COMMENTS: https://corbettreport.com/michael-antoniou-on-the-dangers-of-glyphosate/ ARE YOU LOOKING FOR SHOW NOTES WITH LINKS TO ALL OF THE ARTICLES, VIDEOS AND WEBSITES MENTIONED? HOW ABOUT COMMENTS? THEY’RE AT THE CORBETT REPORT WEBSITE! JUST FOLLOW THE “SHOW NOTES AND COMMENTS” LINK ABOVE TO GO THERE DIRECTLY.
The Supreme Court has sided with the maker of Roundup weedkiller, blocking thousands of lawsuits alleging it failed to warn users the product could cause cancer.
The Supreme Court on Thursday restricted Americans’ ability to sue pesticide makers over alleged health harms stemming from their products. In a 7-2 ruling, the court held that some claims that pesticide companies failed to warn users of their products’ health risks are blocked under federal law. Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5940264-supreme-pesticides-roundup-bayer-maha/ #Roundup #MAHA #SupremeCourt #Pesticides #Environment #Health
The Supreme Court has sided with the maker of Roundup weedkiller, blocking thousands of lawsuits alleging it failed to warn users the product could cause cancer
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that consumers can't use state courts to bring "failure-to-warn" lawsuits against manufacturers that don't warn of hazards surrounding their products. Why it matters: The case was a major friction point for activists in the "Make America Healthy Again" movement, who have been calling for a crackdown on chemicals like glyphosate, the active ingredient in the weedkiller Roundup, in the food supply. Driving the news: In a 7-2 ruling , justices said federal pesticide law preempts a lawsuit against Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, for failing to include a warning about cancer risks on the label. - While Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pointed to glyphosate as an environmental toxin that contributes to…
The central issue in the Roundup case, filed by Missouri resident James Durnell, was who decides what should appear on a pesticide or insecticide label—and whether a federal law overrides state claims.
