NYTIMES (Alan Feuer) - Blocking Trump’s Fund, Judge Presses for Guarantee It Won’t Move Forward
The ruling was the strongest effort to date to hold the administration to its word that its plans to create the fund have actually been set aside.
The ruling was the strongest effort to date to hold the administration to its word that its plans to create the fund have actually been set aside.
A court ruled that Yoon Suk Yeol, the impeached former president, had sought to stir up instability to justify his bid for authoritarian rule in 2024.
The Justice Department's "anti-weaponization" fund was ended by the Trump administration, not a judge's ruling. The Hill's Zach Schonfeld breaks down what the judge’s order actually did and why it was limited in scope. #justicedepartment #doj #trumpadministration #judge #ruling #judgeruling #thegavel #antiweaponization #antiweaponizationfund
The ruling comes after accusations that President Donald Trump weaponized his Justice Department by indicting ex-FBI chief James Comey for using the phrase.
The Justice Department said it 'strongly disagrees' with the court's ruling that paused a $1.776 fund for victims of government "weaponization," but would still abide by it.
The DOJ has issued a statement saying it will abide by a district judge's ruling that temporarily ordered the freezing of the administration's "Anti-Weaponization Fund."
A federal judge on Friday ordered President Donald Trump’s name removed from the Kennedy Center, delivering a major setback to the administration-backed effort to overhaul […] Source
John F. Kennedy's niece, journalist Maria Shriver, called the ruling "an appropriate birthday present on my uncle's birthday today."
A federal judge ordered the Kennedy Center to take President Trump’s name off the building. What happens next?
In an incensed social media post, President Trump suggested that the ruling might prompt him to cast the center aside after more than a year at its helm.