Print Mode Enable Media Only

News chronological

2 items before 1150760 (Keyword: "second-amendment-foundation" (~2 currently found))

DAILYCALLER (Harold Hutchison) - Watch Home Invaders Meet Armed Occupant. It Doesn’t End Well For Them.

The 34-second video posted to X on July 7 shows the two suspects, one of whom was holding a large revolver, trying to kick the door in

Two would-be home invaders were lucky that they weren’t taking a final exam in Victim Selection 101, because they picked the wrong house. The 34-second video posted to X by Gun Lovers Club shows the two suspects, one of whom was holding a large revolver, trying to kick the door in over a period of about 15 seconds. That delay in forcing their entry apparently gave the occupant of the house enough time to retrieve a firearm of his own. (RELATED: This Has To Be Most ‘Insane’ Firearms Instructor Ever) Once the door was forced open, after it took our suspects about five kicks, the homeowner fired three rounds, sending the would-be home invaders fleeing. Two to three seconds later, the homeowner fires a couple more rounds at the…Open

DAILYCALLER (Harold Hutchison) - Pro-2A Group Asks SCOTUS To Remind New York City About 10-Year-Old Case That Tossed Stun Gun Ban

‘This case essentially is Caetano 2.0’

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) petitioned the Supreme Court Tuesday to take a case involving a stun gun ban, accusing a federal appeals court of flouting a decade-old ruling by the high court. The Supreme Court ruled in Caetano v. Massachusetts that a ban on stun guns was unconstitutional on Second Amendment grounds in a unanimous per curiam (unsigned) ruling released on March 21, 2016. SAF referenced the 2016 decision at the opening of its petition for a writ of certiorari. (RELATED: California Almost Completely Ignores Recent SCOTUS 2A Ruling While Defending Glock Ban From DOJ Suit) “This case essentially is Caetano 2.0. In Caetano v. Massachusetts, this Court summarily vacated a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision…Open