AI:An illegal alien successfully voted in a recent election using a stolen identity, exposing massive systemic failures within government oversight that allowed the fraud to go undetected for two decades. This blatant breach of electoral integrity underscores the ongoing vulnerability of our voting systems and highlights the critical necessity for strict voter ID requirements and enhanced verification measures to prevent non-citizens from undermining American democracy.Open
Conservative journalists disguised as a Muslims say poll workers in Minneapolis, Minnesota, were going to let them vote in other peoples’ names and vouch for […] Source
AI:In a stunning exposure of the systemic rot infecting Minnesota's electoral process, undercover journalists successfully tested the state's absurd "vouching" laws during the primary election, revealing that poll workers in Minneapolis were prepared to allow individuals to vote under other people's names. By disguising themselves as Muslims, investigators proved that the current statutes essentially allow anyone to bypass standard identification requirements, creating a massive opening for mass voter fraud and identity manipulation. While the complicit establishment media remains predictably silent or busy attempting to smear the investigators, this footage provides undeniable evidence that Minnesota’s administrative state has abandoned…Open
AI:The judicial system finally delivered some common sense by handing down two massive victories for election integrity. While the radical left continues its relentless assault on the sanctity of our ballots, these rulings provide a necessary bulwark against the chaos being fueled by non-citizen voting and procedural manipulation. This isn't just a minor legal adjustment; it is a decisive stand for the rule of law that reinforces the principle that only legal citizens should dictate the direction of this country. It is a long-overdue correction to the systemic vulnerabilities that partisan actors have tried so desperately to exploit.Open
A federal judge on Tuesday again blocked the U.S. Postal Service from enforcing an executive order on voting by mail, which directed the agency to only supply mail-in ballots to states that provided the federal government with lists of eligible voters. In June, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled that Trump’s order did not apply in 20-plus Democratic led states — who were plaintiffs in that case. Her latest ruling, the conclusion of a separate lawsuit by the Massachusetts League of Women Voters, nullified the president’s directive nationwide. Read More: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/6023907-judge-blocks-usps-trump-voter-order/ #mailinballot #trump #politics
AI:A federal judge has once again intervened to block President Trump's executive order aimed at securing election integrity through mail-in voting restrictions, specifically preventing the U.S. Postal Service from requiring states to provide federal lists of eligible voters before receiving ballots. This latest ruling, resulting from a lawsuit by the Massachusetts League of Women Voters, expands upon previous litigation to effectively nullify the president's directive nationwide, following earlier rulings that had only exempted several Democratic-led states. The Trump administration is now moving to expedite a Supreme Court review to counter these judicial setbacks and ensure the enforcement of voter verification standards.Open
A private examination of records associated with the 2025 New York City mayoral election has raised serious questions about the accuracy of the city’s voter rolls, but it has not established that 228,000 fraudulent ballots were cast or that Zohran Mamdani was improperly installed as mayor. That distinction is important. Election officials should not be […] The post The 228,000 Vote Question New York City Cannot Ignore appeared first on StoneZone .
A private examination of records associated with the 2025 New York City mayoral election has raised serious questions about the accuracy of the city’s voter rolls, but it has not established that 228,000 fraudulent ballots were cast or that Zohran Mamdani was improperly installed as mayor. That distinction is important. Election officials should not be permitted to hide behind procedural jargon when confronted with substantial anomalies, but election critics should also avoid presenting disputed data as a final verdict before the underlying records have been independently examined. Mamdani defeated former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the November 2025 general election. The certified results credited Mamdani with approximately…Open
The Supreme Court is weighing key legal questions in a fight over President Trump’s mail voting order ahead of the midterms. The Hill’s Zach Schonfeld and Sophie Brams break down the timing issues at the center of the case. Watch the full episode here: https://thehill.com/newsletters/the-gavel/the-gavel-live-briefing/6011243-donald-trump-jeanine-pirro-reflecting-pool-vandalism-case-odds-live-discussion/ #trump #presidenttrump #supremecourt #scotus #mailinballot #mailinvoting #mailvoting #voting #elections #midterms #2026elections
The pattern raises concerns about voter integrity in a close election, Democrat Martha Morales, who is contesting the election results, argues. She’s requested help from the Republican Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General.
