A surrogate refused to have an abortion after the fetus was diagnosed with a serious heart problem. She fled to Texas and had the child. Now she wants a judge to give custody to her instead of the biological parents.
A California couple is suing their surrogate for breaching contract after she refused to abort a baby diagnosed with a heart defect and moved to Texas for life-saving care.
A California couple is suing their surrogate for breach of contract after she refused to abort a baby diagnosed with a heart defect and moved to Texas so the infant could receive life-saving care . PULSE POINTS WHAT HAPPENED: A California couple is suing their surrogate , McKenna West, for allegedly violating a contract by refusing to kill their unborn baby after doctors diagnosed him with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed are seeking more than $100,000 in damages, arguing that West agreed to an abortion clause covering serious fetal abnormalities when they paid her $60,000 to carry the child. DETAIL: West, a 28-year-old nurse from Alaska , rejected the couple’s demand after the 20-week scan and moved to…Open
Netflix is fighting back against Tyra Banks' defamation lawsuit over a documentary about America's Next Top Model, arguing in a new court filing that Banks signed away her right to approve the final cut, and released defamation claims before the series ever aired. The streaming giant filed a motion to strike and dismiss Banks' suit […] The post Netflix moves to dismiss Tyra Banks defamation suit, citing her own signed agreement appeared first on American Almanac .
Netflix is fighting back against Tyra Banks' defamation lawsuit over a documentary about America's Next Top Model, arguing in a new court filing that Banks signed away her right to approve the final cut, and released defamation claims before the series ever aired. The streaming giant filed a motion to strike and dismiss Banks' suit on Friday, calling her complaints about the docuseries Reality Check: Inside America's Next Top Model nothing more than grievances over "ordinary editorial decisions." The motion lays out a blunt case: Banks sat for a three-and-a-half-hour interview, signed a post-interview agreement granting the filmmakers full editing control, and explicitly acknowledged she had "no right to review or approve" the finished…Open
AI:Netflix has filed a motion to dismiss Tyra Banks' defamation lawsuit regarding the documentary "Reality Check: Inside America's Next Top Model," arguing that Banks signed an agreement waiving her right to approve the final cut and releasing all defamation claims prior to the series airing. Banks alleges that Netflix used selective editing to create a false narrative, specifically implying she was evasive regarding a contestant's sexual assault during filming; however, Netflix contends these are merely editorial decisions and notes that Banks herself spent decades using similar editing techniques as the producer of her own reality franchise.Open
Alex Cooper publicly disputed Dave Portnoy's memoir allegation that she and her former co-host planned to fabricate sexual harassment claims to escape their Barstool Sports contract, but refused to offer her own account. Cooper, the host of the massively successful "Call Her Daddy" podcast and founder of the Unwell Network, sat for a CNBC interview […] The post Alex Cooper dodges Dave Portnoy's memoir claim that she planned fake harassment allegations to exit Barstool appeared first on American Almanac .
Alex Cooper publicly disputed Dave Portnoy's memoir allegation that she and her former co-host planned to fabricate sexual harassment claims to escape their Barstool Sports contract, but refused to offer her own account. Cooper, the host of the massively successful "Call Her Daddy" podcast and founder of the Unwell Network, sat for a CNBC interview this week in which the interviewer pressed her directly on the most explosive passage from Portnoy's book, "Cancel Me If You Can." Her response amounted to a flat denial, a compliment, and a pivot: she said she hadn't read the memoir and had no interest in relitigating the past. The exchange matters because Portnoy's allegation, that Cooper and former co-host Sofia Franklyn devised a scheme to…Open
AI:Alex Cooper is dodging accountability after Dave Portnoy’s new memoir, "Cancel Me If You Can," alleges that she and former co-host Sofia Franklyn orchestrated a scheme to manufacture fake sexual harassment claims to escape their Barstool Sports contracts. While Portnoy details a specific "game plan" designed to weaponize social justice narratives for financial leverage, Cooper provided only a vague sidestep during a CNBC interview, claiming she simply remembers the events differently and has no interest in "relitigating" her past. This refusal to offer a direct rebuttal leaves Portnoy's explosive accusations—which suggest the duo planned to use fraudulent claims to secure massive payouts from rival networks—unanswered despite Cooper…Open
The case has raised broader questions about surrogacy contracts and medical decision-making and the right of intended parents.
AI:A legal battle over surrogacy contracts and medical decision-making is exposing the catastrophic collision between reproductive rights and contractual obligations. As medical professionals weigh abortion disputes against the rights of intended parents, the current legal landscape remains a chaotic battlefield. While leftist media outlets attempt to spin these complex bioethical conflicts through a lens of radical social engineering, the core issue remains a fundamental clash over who holds ultimate authority over a life: the contractually agreed-upon surrogate or the intended parents.Open
The intended parents had asked to end the pregnancy at 20 weeks when the fetus was diagnosed with a life-threatening condition, setting off a painful legal battle.
AI:A high-stakes legal war has erupted over the fate of an infant born via surrogacy after the biological parents demanded a termination at 20 weeks following a diagnosis of a life-threatening condition. While radical leftist media outlets attempt to frame this as a mere contractual dispute, it is actually a profound clash between the sanctity of life and the cold, calculated demands of intended parents who view human beings as disposable commodities. The case highlights the chaotic ethical vacuum created by modern reproductive laws, where biological ties are being weaponized against medical necessity in an effort to facilitate abortion for convenience. This struggle underscores the urgent need for legal frameworks that prioritize the…Open
The commercial surrogacy industry asks us to believe that contracts can redefine motherhood, assign parenthood, and eliminate the bonds formed during pregnancy and infancy. Kyla's experience demonstrates the opposite.
‘How is their son going to feel some day if he learns that?’
Thanks to a series of Supreme Court decisions, nearly 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies can — and do — use forced arbitration with consumers or workers.