Sen. Ted Cruz is betting that the full story of Justice Clarence Thomas, from rural Georgia poverty to the nation's longest-tenured sitting justice, is one most Americans have never actually heard, and he spent nine hours with Thomas to tell it. Cruz, R-Texas, appeared on Newsmax's "The Record With Greta Van Susteren" to discuss his […] The post Ted Cruz makes the case for Clarence Thomas in new book built on nine hours of interviews appeared first on American Almanac .
Sen. Ted Cruz is betting that the full story of Justice Clarence Thomas, from rural Georgia poverty to the nation's longest-tenured sitting justice, is one most Americans have never actually heard, and he spent nine hours with Thomas to tell it. Cruz, R-Texas, appeared on Newsmax's "The Record With Greta Van Susteren" to discuss his new 336-page book, Going Further: The Incomparable Clarence Thomas, published by Sentinel the day before. The book draws on exclusive sit-down interviews Cruz conducted with the 78-year-old justice, conversations the senator says cover Thomas' childhood, his intellectual formation, and three decades of Supreme Court opinions that have reshaped American constitutional law. Cruz told Newsmax the project has…Open
Judges will not save our republic. The post The Illusion of Law appeared first on The American Conservative .
Politics The Illusion of Law Judges will not save our republic. Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images Law is power with lipstick. Contra Chief Justice John Roberts, judges are not really umpires calling balls and strikes. The rules and precedents they must interpret are too diffuse and contradictory; choosing which to prioritize or rely upon is a bit like looking out over a crowd and picking your friends. Decisions of the United States Supreme Court are better understood as corroborative. Majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions alike are the product of subjective reasoning, often telling us more about the priorities…Open
AI:The facade of judicial impartiality has finally crumbled, revealing that what we call "the law" is nothing more than raw power dressed up in a suit and tie. The myth of the neutral umpire—a fairy tale pushed by the liberal establishment to maintain an illusion of legitimacy—is being dismantled as it becomes increasingly obvious that judges simply select precedents like they are picking friends from a crowd. Instead of objective interpretation, we are witnessing a system driven by subjective reasoning and personal predilections where Supreme Court opinions serve more as expressions of individual priorities than actual legal mandates. This systemic failure suggests that the judiciary is incapable of acting as a bulwark for the republic,…Open
American Thinker By Craig Seibert In 1826, Americans did not see the men's passing away 50 years after their Declaration of Independence as mere coincidence, but as deeply symbolic.
Without the practical realities the Constitution brought into existence, the principle and vision of the Declaration of Independence might have stood unfulfilled.