Alito wrote that the plaintiff states and federal courts — including SCOTUS — 'bear a substantial share of the blame for the rule’s timing.'
Last night, the Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to restrict mail-in ballots for the November midterms. Joe celebrates the ruling but blasts the two dissenting votes: Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas. He tells the panel the two justices are “all in” on Trump’s efforts to destroy democracy.
'The plaintiff States cannot claim the timing of the rule tilts the equities in their favor when they, and courts hearing their claims, are responsible for so much of the delay,' wrote Justice Alito in dissent.
While it tried to show otherwise, The Guardian was forced to admit there is no evidence suggesting Alito has financial conflicts in an upcoming SCOTUS case.
AI:The Guardian attempted a smear campaign against Supreme Court Justice Alito by alleging financial conflicts regarding an upcoming case, but the outlet ultimately failed to produce any evidence to support these claims of misconduct. This latest hit job follows a recurring pattern of media outlets targeting conservative jurists and officials with baseless allegations of corruption.Open
Rumors of a planned Alito retirement have circulated for years, though they gained steam in recent months, culminating in an erroneous NPR article that announced his retirement prematurely. An editor's note addressed the mistake.
People are finally starting to appreciate how instrumental Justice Alito is to many of the Supreme Court's consequential decisions.
Justice Barrett could learn from Civil War jurisprudence. The post In Mail-In Ballots Decision, the Supreme Court Ignored History appeared first on The American Conservative .
Politics In Mail-In Ballots Decision, the Supreme Court Ignored History Justice Barrett could learn from Civil War jurisprudence. (Photo by Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images) With a flurry of cases decided last month, the Supreme Court has officially wrapped up its latest term. Much of the attention was absorbed by the Court’s ruling on birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara , a decision that provoked outrage and indignation from immigration hawks. But amidst this furor, another important decision flew under the radar. This was Watson v. Republican National Committee , in which the Court ruled 5–4 that…Open
This term, Justice Alito delivered major wins for conservatives on voting rights, immigration and guns. He’s given no indication that he’s ready to step down.
Judge Andrew Napolitano and former federal prosecutor Doug Burns joined “Wake Up America” to break down the details of the Supreme Court decision affirming birthright citizenship, the strong dissents from Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch, and why the decision leaves very little room for future executive or congressional intervention.