Trump is being sued over a new Truth Social feature selling premium access to his posts. Nicolle Wallace is joined by Brendan Ballou, who is representing the media groups in the lawsuit, and Melissa Murray for analysis on Deadline White House.
AI:The radical left-wing media apparatus at MSNBC is back at it again, peddling more hysterical fearmongering regarding Truth Social's decision to sell premium access to Donald Trump’s posts. In this latest installment of partisan theater, Nicolle Wallace and her panel of leftist stenographers attempt to frame a standard digital monetization strategy as some kind of "corruption plot." They even brought on the very attorney driving the lawsuit, Brendan Ballou, to lend a veneer of legitimacy to what is clearly a coordinated legal ambush designed to hamstring the President’s direct line of communication with the American people. While these establishment pundits act completely dumbstruck by basic business evolution, they are actually just…Open
Media groups are suing President Trump for selling early access to his Truth Social posts costing $100K. Brendan Ballou, who is representing the plaintiffs, and Chief of Editorial at Freedom of the Press Foundation Kirstin McCudden, one of the plaintiffs, join Peter Alexander to explain more on their case.
AI:Legal combat has erupted as media organizations sue Donald Trump for allegedly profiting from official information via Truth Social's $100,000 premium access scheme. Plaintiffs represented by lawyer Brendan Ballou and Freedom of the Press Foundation’s Kirstin McCudden argue that selling expedited access to presidential communications constitutes a profound corruption of office. While the left-wing press scrambles to frame this as a legal crisis regarding public information, they ignore the fundamental reality that these private entities are merely seeking to monetize digital interactions in an era where traditional media outlets have failed the people.Open
Media groups are suing President Trump for selling early access to his Truth Social posts costing $100K. Brendan Ballou, who is representing the plaintiffs, and Chief of Editorial at Freedom of the Press Foundation Kirstin McCudden, one of the plaintiffs, join Peter Alexander to explain more on their case.
AI:Legal activists and media organizations are launching a coordinated attack against President Trump for allegedly selling $100,000 premium access to his Truth Social posts. This litigation claims that monetizing early access to information constitutes a corrupt scheme to profit from official government communications through a private entity. While the radical left-wing press attempts to frame this as a massive corruption plot, it is clearly another attempt by establishment lawyers to weaponize the legal system against the President for his communication methods.Open
As the self-enrichment of Donald Trump in his second term reaches new extreme heights, Trump is now being sued for the new Truth Social service that charges up to $100,000 for early access to the president's market-moving posts. Former federal prosecutor Ankush Khardori joins The Weeknight to break down the latest grift.
AI:A former federal prosecutor has voiced support for a new lawsuit targeting President Trump over a controversial Truth Social service that reportedly charges up to $100,000 for early access to his market-moving posts. This legal challenge seeks to address allegations of self-enrichment and corruption stemming from the President's private company providing premium access to official communications, adding to a growing wave of litigation regarding Trump's business dealings during his second term.Open
President Donald Trump is being sued over a new service from his social media platform, Truth Social, that charges customers up to $100,000 for early notifications to his posts, with plaintiffs arguing “the scheme is extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional.” MS NOW's Fallon Gallagher breaks it down.
AI:President Donald Trump is facing a lawsuit over a new service from Truth Social that reportedly charges customers as much as $100,000 for early notifications regarding his posts. The plaintiffs are characterizing this premium access scheme as extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional, marking the latest legal skirmish aimed at President Trump's private business interests and media platforms.Open
