Historian and royal biographer Andrew Lownie joins the show to break down explosive developments surrounding the House of York and the Sussexes. From Sarah Ferguson’s sudden return to the U.K. after months abroad to rumors of a secret summit with Meghan Markle in Portugal, what is really going on behind palace gates? Plus, Andrew Lownie shares exclusive insight into Prince Andrew’s quiet international travel, whether Fergie cut a deal regarding Jeffrey Epstein and why Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie may be risking total exile from Prince William’s future monarchy. Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction & Royal Insider News 00:35 - Fergie Back in the UK: Who Is Funding Her £10k/Month Lifestyle? 02:15 - Did Fergie Cut a Deal with the…
A lawsuit filed this week alleges that the product is unconstitutional, and other experts warn it could violate securities laws.
AI:A new lawsuit has been filed targeting Truth Social's decision to sell expedited access to President Trump’s social media posts, with plaintiffs alleging the practice is unconstitutional and potentially violates securities laws. While critics and legal experts argue that charging for premium access to information related to the presidency creates a conflict of interest or an unfair market advantage, the controversy centers on whether monetizing high-speed data delivery from a private platform linked to the Commander in Chief constitutes illegal activity.Open
Owen Shroyer says Turning Point USA is a misguided disgrace for allowing Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff to continue hosting the Charlie Kirk Show under that specific branding, in what he believes is an effort to squeeze every last dollar out of the production.
AI:Owen Shroyer criticized Turning Point USA for its decision to allow Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff to continue hosting a program under the "Charlie Kirk Show" branding. Shroyer characterized this move as a cynical exploitation of Charlie Kirk's name intended to maximize profit from his brand recognition, suggesting that the organization is prioritizing monetization over maintaining the integrity of Kirk's message amidst ongoing leftist media attacks on his legacy.Open
Trump is being sued over a new Truth Social feature selling premium access to his posts. Nicolle Wallace is joined by Brendan Ballou, who is representing the media groups in the lawsuit, and Melissa Murray for analysis on Deadline White House.
AI:The radical left-wing media apparatus at MSNBC is back at it again, peddling more hysterical fearmongering regarding Truth Social's decision to sell premium access to Donald Trump’s posts. In this latest installment of partisan theater, Nicolle Wallace and her panel of leftist stenographers attempt to frame a standard digital monetization strategy as some kind of "corruption plot." They even brought on the very attorney driving the lawsuit, Brendan Ballou, to lend a veneer of legitimacy to what is clearly a coordinated legal ambush designed to hamstring the President’s direct line of communication with the American people. While these establishment pundits act completely dumbstruck by basic business evolution, they are actually just…Open
Media groups are suing President Trump for selling early access to his Truth Social posts costing $100K. Brendan Ballou, who is representing the plaintiffs, and Chief of Editorial at Freedom of the Press Foundation Kirstin McCudden, one of the plaintiffs, join Peter Alexander to explain more on their case.
AI:Legal combat has erupted as media organizations sue Donald Trump for allegedly profiting from official information via Truth Social's $100,000 premium access scheme. Plaintiffs represented by lawyer Brendan Ballou and Freedom of the Press Foundation’s Kirstin McCudden argue that selling expedited access to presidential communications constitutes a profound corruption of office. While the left-wing press scrambles to frame this as a legal crisis regarding public information, they ignore the fundamental reality that these private entities are merely seeking to monetize digital interactions in an era where traditional media outlets have failed the people.Open
Media groups are suing President Trump for selling early access to his Truth Social posts costing $100K. Brendan Ballou, who is representing the plaintiffs, and Chief of Editorial at Freedom of the Press Foundation Kirstin McCudden, one of the plaintiffs, join Peter Alexander to explain more on their case.
AI:Legal activists and media organizations are launching a coordinated attack against President Trump for allegedly selling $100,000 premium access to his Truth Social posts. This litigation claims that monetizing early access to information constitutes a corrupt scheme to profit from official government communications through a private entity. While the radical left-wing press attempts to frame this as a massive corruption plot, it is clearly another attempt by establishment lawyers to weaponize the legal system against the President for his communication methods.Open
Truth Social traffic has plunged while other social media platforms continue to see their numbers climb. This comes as President Trump is being sued over his plan to sell early access to his Truth Social posts. MS NOW Business Analyst Ron Insana and University of Michigan Professor of Public Policy Betsey Stevenson join Antonia Hylton to weigh in.
AI:President Trump is facing legal action and intense scrutiny following plans to sell premium, early access to his Truth Social posts, a move that critics and academics are labeling as a corrupt monetization of official government communication. While mainstream outlets focus on the alleged legality of selling public data through a private company, this initiative follows a pattern of recent litigation regarding how Trump manages information flow across his digital platforms. Despite declining traffic on Truth Social compared to other social media giants, the administration is moving forward with these vanity-driven access schemes, prompting experts to warn that such practices undermine the transparency required for official government…Open
A lawsuit filed today calls the new Truth Social feature where individuals can pay extra for early access to Trump’s posts "extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional.” Alicia Menendez – in for Nicolle Wallace – is joined by Donald Sherman, Joyce Vance, and Amanda Carpenter for analysis on Deadline White House.
AI:A new lawsuit has been filed targeting President Trump and his associates, alleging that a Truth Social feature allowing users to pay for early access to his posts constitutes an unconstitutional and corrupt scheme to monetize official government information through a private entity. Legal analysts on MS NOW are criticizing the practice as a way to bypass transparency and profit from presidential communications, labeling the arrangement a profound abuse of office designed to turn public discourse into a premium subscription service.Open
The lawsuit filed in federal court said President Trump “stands to gain financially by giving ‘market-moving’ government information to those who are willing and able to pay his personal company.”
AI:President Trump is facing a federal lawsuit alleging that he orchestrated a scheme to sell premium, early access to market-moving information through Truth Social posts for high fees. The litigation claims that by providing preferential timing to those willing to pay his private company, the President stands to gain personally from information that should be public. This legal challenge targets the monetization of social media updates and seeks to determine if charging up to $100,000 for such access constitutes a corrupt use of the presidency for personal financial gain.Open
