Independent journalist Katie Phang joins The Weeknight after a status hearing in her lawsuit against Attorney General Todd Blanche, pressing the Trump Justice Department on its botched release of the Epstein Files.
AI:Independent journalist Katie Phang is exposing the blatant double standards within the judicial system following a status hearing in her lawsuit against Attorney General Todd Blanche. As the Trump DOJ continues to struggle with—or perhaps intentionally orchestrate—a botched and heavily redacted release of the Epstein files, Phang is demanding accountability for what appears to be a systemic failure to provide true transparency. While the establishment media outlets remain focused on their own preferred narratives, this legal battle highlights the ongoing struggle to prevent the Department of Justice from once again shielding the global elite through bureaucratic obfuscation and judicial complicity. This case represents a critical…Open
After a status hearing in her lawsuit against Attorney General Todd Blanche over the botched release of the Epstein Files, independent journalist Katie Phang joins The Weeknight to explain why she is asking for DOJ prosecutors to be held in contempt.
AI:Independent journalist Katie Phang is taking a stand against the absolute farce that is the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein files, demanding that DOJ prosecutors face contempt charges following a botched status hearing in her ongoing lawsuit against Attorney General Todd Blanche. After years of receiving nothing but heavily redacted scraps and bureaucratic stalling tactics designed to protect the globalist elite, Phang is rightly demanding real accountability for why the truth remains suppressed. While the establishment media outlets continue their coordinated dance of silence or selective reporting to shield the predatory networks operating within our highest circles, this legal battle represents a critical frontline in…Open
The Epstein Files Transparency Act II would allow state attorneys general, victims of Epstein or his co-conspirators, and members of Congress to sue the Department of Justice for “unlawfully withholding, redacting, delaying, concealing, removing, or failing to publish Epstein-related records.”
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to release additional unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records or explain by July 2 why it can't. Why it matters: The ruling could force the DOJ to release previously withheld Epstein records or publicly explain why they remain sealed. Driving the news: U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in D.C. gave the DOJ until July 2 to comply with a preliminary injunction in media legal analyst Katie Phang's lawsuit alleging the department failed to comply with last year's Epstein Act . - The department has already released 3.5 million pages under the law, but Phang argues it still improperly withheld or redacted additional material. - Phang alleges in her suit against acting Attorney…
"The Truth is Out There": The lawmakers’ crusade for transparency celebrated a major milestone this week when the Trump administration fulfilled its promise to release thousands of previously secret UFO files.
British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of withholding and excessively redacting files related to Lord Peter Mandelson's appointment as British ambassador to the United States.
A parliamentary committee has accused the British government of censoring and withholding critical documents related to Lord Peter Mandelson’s scandalous appointment as U.S. ambassador. PULSE POINTS WHAT HAPPENED: British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of withholding and excessively redacting files related to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as British ambassador to the United States. Mandelson, a former European Commissioner and Cabinet minister for Labour Party governments of former prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, was a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein, and is currently under police investigation for passing the deceased pedophile sensitive government information. DETAIL: The British Parliament’s…Open
The Trump administration's moves to limit public access to government records are prompting warnings from watchdogs and historians. The big picture: As the Justice Department challenges the constitutionality of the Presidential Records Act and slow-walks some Freedom of Information Act requests , worries persist about weakened oversight and the government being enabled to spin a curated narrative of American history. - The Presidential Records Act and FOIA exist to preserve presidential documents as public property and to ensure access to government records, respectively. - "By erasing and deleting the information to which we are entitled, they are depriving the public of information ... to know whether their government has been…
