Every major social/political movement over the last 125 years has inevitably split in two because of ambition, policy, tactical disagreements, and personality conflicts. In Russia, it was the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. The two factions officially split into separate political parties in 1912. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, argued that Russia could bypass a prolonged capitalist […] The post Who Do We Root for to Win the DSA Civil War? The Commies or the Crazies? appeared first on StoneZone .
Every major social/political movement over the last 125 years has inevitably split in two because of ambition, policy, tactical disagreements, and personality conflicts. In Russia, it was the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. The two factions officially split into separate political parties in 1912. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, argued that Russia could bypass a prolonged capitalist phase by forging an immediate alliance between industrial workers and peasants, seizing power directly through a radical vanguard, and establishing a “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The Mensheviks, led by Julius Martov and Pavel Axelrod, favored a broad, inclusive party structure open to trade unionists and sympathetic workers. They believed Russia was…Open
New reporting from The New York Times reveals that DHS used undercover agents and other invasive tactics to investigate protesters and organizations during the Minnesota ICE surge.
AI:The mainstream media's usual charade of selective outrage is at it again, as the New York Times confirms what we have long suspected: the Department of Homeland Security has deployed a shadow network of undercover agents and invasive surveillance tactics to monitor protesters in Minnesota during the recent ICE surge. While leftist outlets attempt to frame this as "investigative" necessity, it is nothing more than an escalation in the high-tech warfare being waged against those attempting to dismantle federal immigration enforcement. This revelation underscores the extreme volatility in the region, where radical agitators have been using state-run portals and encrypted chats to track federal agents, only to have the DHS respond with…Open
The New York Times reports that DHS used subpoenas, financial records, and undercover surveillance to target unions and activist groups in Minnesota—including organizations never accused of crimes.
AI:The establishment media is performing its usual dance of selective outrage, with the New York Times now confirming what has been evident all along: the Department of Homeland Security has launched a massive intelligence operation to penetrate the radical activist networks operating in Minnesota. While these leftist outlets attempt to frame the use of subpoenas and undercover surveillance as some kind of "investigation," they conveniently fail to mention that this is a direct response to the organized efforts by these groups to track, monitor, and endanger federal agents through encrypted chats and state-run portals. The DHS is simply using every tool in its arsenal—including financial records and deep-cover intelligence—to get ahead of…Open
A New York Times analysis details the July 20 crackdown on unarmed protesters in New Delhi that has provoked public outrage and accusations of excessive force.
The Justice Department is using federal conspiracy charges to sweep up ICE protesters. Some legal experts worry the agency is casting too wide a net to prosecute political activists who oppose the Trump administration's deportation agenda.
Some of the young demonstrators who forced out the country’s education minister described their deep-seated anger, frustration and desires that drove them into the streets.
Government supporters are showing off new ties with alleged former dissidents in a bid to show that they can withstand enemies at home as well as abroad.
